<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Razorleaf Corporation&#187; The Official Blog of Razorleaf</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.razorleaf.com/category/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.razorleaf.com</link>
	<description>Innovative Process Solutions. Bottom-Line Results.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:57:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Get Rid of 2D Software: The Resisters</title>
		<link>http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/08/get-rid-of-2d-resistors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/08/get-rid-of-2d-resistors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Rohats</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Process Improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[models]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razorleaf.com/?p=6528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/08/get-rid-of-2d-resistors/"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" src="http://www.razorleaf.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Trainer-with-Flipchart-Photo.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="Trainer with Flipchart Photo" /></a>If you read my earlier rants (first post, second post) about getting rid of 2D, then this one is the next logical step: dealing with the human element.  Inevitably, there will be folks who refuse to give up their 2D software.   This is their comfort zone, and most people don&#8217;t like change anyway.  To ensure [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/08/get-rid-of-2d-resistors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Design Automation Myth</title>
		<link>http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/05/design-automation-myth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/05/design-automation-myth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 15:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Gimbel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Process Improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design Automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design intent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SharePoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SolidWorks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razorleaf.com/?p=7662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/05/design-automation-myth/"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" src="http://www.razorleaf.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Mythbusters.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="Mythbusters" /></a>“Design automation tools are just configurators for finished 3D models and 2D drawings.”  Wow, if only we could get the Mythbusters to take a look at that one.  Nothing would explode, but that myth would certainly be busted.  Design automation goes far beyond the simple configurable design, and automation need not wait until a design [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/05/design-automation-myth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why SOA is Important in ENOVIA V6</title>
		<link>http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/04/soa-enovia-v6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/04/soa-enovia-v6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vik Paranjpe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Systems Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENOVIA V6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENOVIA V6 Service Folders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENOVIA V6 Service Keys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web service]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razorleaf.com/?p=7377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/04/soa-enovia-v6/"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" src="http://www.razorleaf.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Dassault-V6-6-Logo.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="Dassault V6 Logo" /></a>We at Razorleaf have been going through the ENOVIA V6R2010x documentation to figure out the “real” meaning behind the much publicized SOA readiness of V6. Before we dive in, let’s get familiar with the definition of SOA (Service-Oriented Architecture). Out of the hundreds of definitions out there on the web, I will list two that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/04/soa-enovia-v6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cloud-y with a Chance of PLM</title>
		<link>http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/04/cloud-y-with-a-chance-of-plm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/04/cloud-y-with-a-chance-of-plm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Systems Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SaaS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razorleaf.com/?p=7290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/04/cloud-y-with-a-chance-of-plm/"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" src="http://www.razorleaf.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Dark-Cloud.png" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="Dark Cloud" /></a>There is a lot of buzz around cloud computing today, and not all of it is positive.  If you don’t know much about cloud computing, the simplest description is to think about a bank of remote computers whose resources you can harness on an as-needed basis.  Note that this description omits any discussion of where [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/04/cloud-y-with-a-chance-of-plm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting Rid of 2D in 5 Steps</title>
		<link>http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/03/getting-rid-of-2d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/03/getting-rid-of-2d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Rohats</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Process Improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autodesk Inventor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CATIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lean Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siemens Solid Edge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SolidWorks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razorleaf.com/?p=6670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/03/getting-rid-of-2d/"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" src="http://www.razorleaf.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/2Ddies-250x198.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="2Ddies" /></a>If you read my previous rant about why people are still designing in 2D, then this one is the next step: getting rid of the 2D authoring tools at a company.  Today, there&#8217;s no reason why companies can&#8217;t make the switch &#8211; it&#8217;s just a matter of taking the time and having the willpower to do [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/03/getting-rid-of-2d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop Designing in 2D</title>
		<link>http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/03/stop-designing-in-2d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/03/stop-designing-in-2d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Rohats</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Process Improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STEP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razorleaf.com/?p=6524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/03/stop-designing-in-2d/"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" src="http://www.razorleaf.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/2Ddies1-250x198.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="2Ddies" /></a>I am always surprised, no make that astounded, by the number of companies that are still designing in 2D software.  3D CAD has been around, and relatively mainstream, for over two decades.  When I ask this question of my customers they tell me things like &#8220;Oh, Mike can crank out 16 drawings a day in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/03/stop-designing-in-2d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Your SolidWorks Data in Shape?</title>
		<link>http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/02/solidworks-data-in-shape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/02/solidworks-data-in-shape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Rohats</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systems Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broken file reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise PDM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPDM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPDM Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPDM Data Migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPDM Implementation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implementation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legacy data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SolidWorks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razorleaf.com/?p=5565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/02/solidworks-data-in-shape/"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" src="http://www.razorleaf.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/fitness-weight-plates-15419-7811_zoom1-250x113.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="fitness-weight-plates-15419-7811_zoom" title="Fitness Weights" /></a>
Razorleaf has just released the new CADFIT tool for public consumption.  I don&#8217;t recommend actually eating or consuming the tool, but I do recommend that you use it.  &#8220;Well of course you do, you work for Razorleaf.&#8221;  Okay, that factor not withstanding, CADFIT is a really great tool to help you determine the health of your [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/02/solidworks-data-in-shape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Production, Test &amp; Development Environments</title>
		<link>http://www.razorleaf.com/2009/12/prod-test-dev-environments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razorleaf.com/2009/12/prod-test-dev-environments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek Neiding</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Systems Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DA best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plm best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visual Studio.NET]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razorleaf.com/?p=5889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.razorleaf.com/2009/12/prod-test-dev-environments/"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" src="http://www.razorleaf.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/White-Keyboard-250x187.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="White Keyboard" /></a>Many of the systems our clients work with could rightly be considered business critical systems.  Whether its Design Automation (DA) tools, a PLM/PDM system, a custom application, or a tool for electronic process automation Razorleaf&#8217;s clients would be hard-pressed to efficiently complete their day’s activities if the system was down or not operating as it should.  There [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razorleaf.com/2009/12/prod-test-dev-environments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Change Your Process Step 3: The 80/20 Rule</title>
		<link>http://www.razorleaf.com/2009/12/business-process-change-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razorleaf.com/2009/12/business-process-change-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Rohats</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Process Improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razorleaf.com/?p=4398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.razorleaf.com/2009/12/business-process-change-3/"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" src="http://www.razorleaf.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/80-20.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="80-20" title="80-20" /></a>
Have you ever attempted to map a process, only to get bogged down in the details?  What seemed like a simple flow chart with four or five boxes got really complicated when you started accounting for all of the special case scenarios?  If you&#8217;ve experienced this situation, then you&#8217;ll certainly appreciate this installment of my blog series [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razorleaf.com/2009/12/business-process-change-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maybe Dassault Isn&#8217;t Crazy</title>
		<link>http://www.razorleaf.com/2009/11/dassault-not-crazy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.razorleaf.com/2009/11/dassault-not-crazy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Additional Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artizone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dassault Systemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENOVIA SmarTeam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENOVIA V6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razorleaf.com/?p=5336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.razorleaf.com/2009/11/dassault-not-crazy/"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" src="http://www.razorleaf.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Artizone-Logo.png" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="Artizone Logo" title="Artizone Logo" /></a>With Dassault recently announcing the spin-off of SmarTeam V5 development to Artizone, a lot of people have opinions (and concerns) about what Dassault Systemes (DS) is doing with the ENOVIA brand these days.  I can’t offer definitive answers since I don’t work for DS, but I know enough people at the ENOVIA brand that I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.razorleaf.com/2009/11/dassault-not-crazy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
