<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Razorleaf Joins Aras Partner Program</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/01/razorleaf-aras/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/01/razorleaf-aras/</link>
	<description>Innovative Process Solutions. Bottom-Line Results.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:31:35 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/01/razorleaf-aras/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razorleaf.com/?p=6205#comment-159</guid>
		<description>We certainly see our relationship with Aras as an exiciting opportunity for us and our clients in terms of PLM choice.  I believe that open source PLM and licensed solutions can certainly co-exist (we have multiple clients doing/planning this today).  However, as open source PLM is relatively new, I think it is too early to tell how open source and licensed PLM solutions will interact.  Currently, I think open source PLM like Aras Innovator does a good job of adding capabilities to traditional PLM when a company already has PLM components in place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We certainly see our relationship with Aras as an exiciting opportunity for us and our clients in terms of PLM choice.  I believe that open source PLM and licensed solutions can certainly co-exist (we have multiple clients doing/planning this today).  However, as open source PLM is relatively new, I think it is too early to tell how open source and licensed PLM solutions will interact.  Currently, I think open source PLM like Aras Innovator does a good job of adding capabilities to traditional PLM when a company already has PLM components in place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oleg Shilovitsky</title>
		<link>http://www.razorleaf.com/2010/01/razorleaf-aras/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Oleg Shilovitsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razorleaf.com/?p=6205#comment-158</guid>
		<description>Jonathan,
I see it as a very interesting turn in expanding of Razorleaf experience. Since, Razorleaf is serving customers with multiple systems, what is your view on co-existence of Open Source PLM with other (licensed) PLM solutions?
Best, Oleg
http://plmtwine.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan,<br />
I see it as a very interesting turn in expanding of Razorleaf experience. Since, Razorleaf is serving customers with multiple systems, what is your view on co-existence of Open Source PLM with other (licensed) PLM solutions?<br />
Best, Oleg<br />
<a href="http://plmtwine.com" rel="nofollow">http://plmtwine.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
